your agents execute your docs
and nobody verifies it

A coding agent reads your API reference and writes a client against it. A deployment agent follows your runbook. A support agent answers a customer out of your guides. None of them can tell whether what they just read is still true.

For a person, a stale page was friction. You would notice the flag had been renamed, check the source, move on. For an agent, a stale page is an instruction. It acts on it, confidently, and hands the result to the next agent in the chain. One wrong page no longer costs one engineer ten minutes. It propagates.

That is the problem Git2Docs was built to solve.

Documentation became infrastructure the moment agents started reading it

Software organizations have added agents far faster than they have added the context those agents depend on. Agents now open pull requests, run test suites, ship releases, triage incidents and answer customers. Every one of those jobs requires an accurate account of how the system actually behaves, and a large share of that account lives in documentation that was written for humans, by humans, at human speed.

The common response is to make documentation agent-readable: structured formats, llms.txt, an MCP endpoint. That work is necessary and we do it. It is not sufficient. Readable is not the same as trustworthy. An agent can parse your reference perfectly and still have no way to know whether the endpoint on the page exists in your code.

Accuracy is the unsolved part. It is the part we work on.

Who we are

We are a team of engineers, product owners and operators. At scale, we have built software, shipped it on deadlines that did not move, run the teams that maintained it, and answered the support tickets when it confused someone. Documentation was never what we set out to work on. It was the thing that kept breaking underneath everything else we were trying to do.

That history is why the product looks the way it does. We know what an engineering hour is worth because we have had to decide where it goes, and we have watched too many of those hours disappear into reconstructing how a system works from the code itself. We have inherited services nobody left an explanation for. We have watched a documentation site go stale in the same sprint it launched. We have seen critical knowledge sit in one person’s head until that person left.

As today’s AI-driven world creates 10x the code production and accelerated deployment, we are not neutral about this problem, and we are not approaching it as a content exercise. We built the tool we wanted on those teams. We understand that these teams need to adapt and run at the speed of AI.

Why we built Git2Docs

Not because documentation goes out of date. Everyone has always known that, and everyone has always lived with it. We built Git2Docs because of what changed when agents started reading it.

We watched coding agents pull in documentation, take it as ground truth, and act on it. An agent does not skim. It does not glance at a last-updated date and think twice. It does not walk over to the person who wrote the service and ask whether the page is still right. It reads the page, believes it, generates work from it, and hands that work to the next system in the line. Stale documentation stopped being a complaint and started being a defect that executes.

Documentation had quietly become a runtime dependency, and nothing was testing it.

So we went looking for the tool that closed that gap, and it was not there. The documentation category had spent a decade getting very good at a different problem: better editors, faster publishing, nicer themes, smarter search. All of it rests on two assumptions — that a human writes the page, and that a human reads it. Neither assumption survives contact with an agentic workflow.

Git2Docs starts somewhere else. Git is the source of truth, so the documentation is derived from the repository rather than written beside it, validated against the code it describes, and the places where the two disagree are published as findings instead of quietly shipped. The point is not a better place to write documentation. The point is being able to tell whether the documentation is true.

That is the part nobody had built. It is the part your agents need. So we built it.

Start with your own repository

Point Git2Docs at a repo and see what it finds. You get generated documentation and, more usefully, a list of the places your current documentation and your current code disagree.

Questions? support@git2docs.com